- "Dr. Khan's research on climate change is wrong because he is a rude and unpleasant person."
- "Dr. Khan's research should be peer-reviewed to check for errors in his methodology and data."
- "I disagree with Dr. Khan's conclusion based on this conflicting evidence."
- "Dr. Khan's research is well-supported by data from multiple independent sources."
Question: Which statement is a logical fallacy known as “ad hominem” (attacking the person, not the argument)?
Facebook
WhatsApp
