- The probability that the alternative hypothesis is true.
- The probability of obtaining observed results (or more extreme) if the null hypothesis is true.
- The effect size of the intervention.
- The sample size.
No category found.
- Complications
- Control
- Comparison
- Current
- To make the study easier to conduct.
- To ensure that every member of the population has an equal chance of being selected, increasing representativeness.
- To select participants based on specific characteristics.
- To reduce the cost of research.
- A study that follows a group of individuals over time to observe the development of a disease or outcome.
- A study that compares individuals with a disease to those without.
- A study that collects data at a single point in time.
- An experimental study with random assignment.
- Introduction
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- The drug has a statistically significant effect.
- The drug's effect is large enough to be meaningful and beneficial in real-world patient care.
- The drug is safe for all patients.
- The drug is approved by regulatory bodies.
- Quantitative data collection
- Experimental design
- Qualitative data collection
- Descriptive statistics
- A statement that predicts a relationship between variables.
- A statement that there is no relationship or difference between variables.
- The researcher's personal opinion.
- The main finding of the study.
- Participant recruitment
- Intervention fidelity
- Data interpretation
- Ethical approval
- To do good and maximize benefits.
- To do no harm or minimize harm.
- To treat all participants fairly.
- To respect participants' autonomy.
- ANOVA
- Chi-square test
- T-test
- Regression analysis
- Errors in data analysis.
- A systematic difference between the participants selected for a study and the target population, or between treatment groups.
- A researcher's personal opinion.
- The difficulty in recruiting participants.
- A peer-reviewed journal article from 5 years ago.
- A textbook chapter from 10 years ago.
- A clinical practice guideline based on recent systematic reviews.
- An anecdotal report from a colleague.
- Patient recruitment
- Research funding
- Post-market surveillance and drug safety profiles
- Data analysis complexity
- Patient-reported pain scores
- Different dosages of pain medication
- Patient age
- Gender of patients
- The ability to generalize findings to other settings.
- The consistency of the findings over time and across researchers.
- The accuracy of the interpretations.
- The relevance of the study to clinical practice.
- Participants behaving differently because they know they are being watched.
- The researcher's expectations or preconceived notions unintentionally influencing the observation or interpretation of data.
- The loss of participants from a study.
- Errors in statistical calculation.
- To publish the final findings.
- To outline the plan for a research study for approval and funding.
- To analyze the data.
- To present the study's conclusions.
- Expert opinion
- Cohort study
- Randomized controlled trial
- Case report
